The reason the majority of data-driven presentations fail is ignorance of effective presentation structure. Freytag’s Pyramid describes a storytelling framework originally designed to analyse dramatic works. it offers an effective, organisational structure that takes the audience on a logical, journey through higher-order thinking to deliver understanding and engagement.

Freytag’s Pyramid consists of five stages. Initial exposition sets the place of the piece within the understanding of the particular audience. It must be succinct and positively engage the attention of the audience. For instance, “Advanced heart failure affects over a million patients annually, leading to high hospitalisation rates and poor quality of life. Current treatments offer limited success in improving outcomes.”
The second stage should introduce the key challenges or complexities of the topic introducing methods to ninvestigate the issue: “To address this, we conducted a multicenter trial prospectively evaluating Drug X, enrolling 500 patients over 12 months with the aim to assess the impact on hospitalisation rates.” The desire to describe every aspect of the data should be over-ridden.
The impact of the intervention must then be clearly stated. It is not the job of the audience to interpret data. That was the role of the researcher. “The results showed a 30% reduction in hospitalisations among patients receiving Drug X—this is a significant breakthrough in the management of heart failure.”
The falling action from this point is to explain the implications of these data as well as the limitations of the study. With your audience’s attention locked in, explain the implications of your findings. How do they change current understanding or practices? Address any limitations or considerations.
The 5th step summarises this message with a clear call to action. The aim of the presentation is to provide data. The objective is for audience behaviour change and the presenter has the opportunity to influence that. “With these findings, Drug X has the potential to become a new standard of care, improving outcomes for millions of patients worldwide. Our next step is integrating this therapy into clinical guidelines.”
The simplistic structure of introduction/aims/method/results/discussion/conclusion are apparent within this structure, but it is the deliberate engagement of the audience that is missing. The passive delivery and receipt of information that may or may not be relevant leaves the audience thinking they may or may not engage, usually the latter. Establishing purpose at the beginning is fundamental.
Freytag’s Pyramid adds emotional depth and engagement that traditional structures like Problem-Solution-Impact may lack. While both focus on clarity and purpose, Freytag’s Pyramid enhances the storytelling aspect, making it particularly effective for persuasive or high-stakes presentations.

Ross, it’s great to see you again! Your messages are so important. I hope all is well in your world, and look forward to more P cubed
Evie! Thank you for the encouragement. I AM back and it’s gonna be even better. If you have thoughts and ideas, please let me know. Things pretty good here. Hope the same is true for you.